Why does the right wing find itself in such a bad place?

For many of us, 2016 is the first election we paid much attention to. Either due to disinterest in the system, age, or just constantly being served boring candidates over the past elections, a lot of people just haven’t been interested in politics. It’s hard to blame us for it; the American political process is a well known shitshow.

Something many of us weren’t aware of before diving in, however, was the extent of the hole conservatives have dug themselves into. There’s some pretty intense writing on the wall: The way these next few elections shape out will not only decide our fate for the next 4-8 years, but also set up the supreme court for decades to come and usher in new laws that define who has the demographic advantage for what could be the entire life of America. Overton’s window has been pushed hard towards the left, and those of us with any sense left are paying the price.

But how did things get this bad? After all, you’d expect some pretty intense push back from conservatives to prevent what is essentially the death of their party if not the right wing as a whole.

We could talk about the overtly left wing media and how its propaganda has put the ball in the left’s court, but what’s more important for diagnosing the problem is finding mistakes the right has made so they can be corrected. There are, essentially, 2 major ones. The first is their legendary loss of the frame. In PUA and debate circles alike the frame refers to the focus and tone of the conversation. When you’re approaching a girl, you want to be in control of the frame so you can communicate the best things about you and make a good impression. If you let the girl have control of the frame, you’ll find yourself in the passenger’s seat, and the girl’s a lot more likely to kick you out for someone with a confident, dominant frame. The same applies to your perception towards the public. You need to stay on the offensive in politics. Even if your opponent has a hundred problems and you have one, letting your opponent have the frame and focus on your problems puts you on the defense. When you’re on the defense, you can’t hope to gain ground, only lose it more slowly. Conservatives apparently missed that memo. They try so hard to avoid every negative label the left throws at them they can’t even come together to make a decent attack on the left wing whose poster children are so corrupt thousands of examples of corruption have come out about them just this week. Because they’re so focused on defending their own image, the right wing can’t even start to make an attack on the leftoid hivemind. Unless they can pull something together, the left will keep them on the defense and erode their influence until there’s none left.

The second major problem is the right wing’s history of making concessions. In a way this also wraps back to frame control. Conservatives who are on the defense and scared of negative labels will cede ground and vote for leftist policies that actively harm them. A conservative who was originally against gay marriage, for fear of being labeled  a bigot, would instead act in favor of it or keep his mouth shut. Do you see conservatives stand in unison against terrorist groups like black lives matter? No, because half of them are so afraid of the ‘racist’ card they’d rather keep their mouth shut or try and curry favor with them. So then they take their votes and vote for all these changes that will bury the party in the next few decade. In doing so not only do they empower the left’s ability to gain more votes, but they even alienate the very people who voted them in, dooming them even further. In the short run they may get a pat on the back, maybe even a few minority votes thrown their way. But there’s no way they can succeed in a country shaped by the left in the long run, and their attempts to hold onto their office even a little longer only doom this country and everyone in it.

Only by going on the offensive and taking back the frame can the right wing have any chance of returning to any sort of power in America. Trump’s the first step, but it’s going to take a lot of alt-righters to get the tone back in our control. It’s ultimately up to us to uncuck this country, and it’s the most important fight this country has seen since its inception. Let’s show them our power and take this country back from the hands of these insane ideologues.

 

Advertisements
Why does the right wing find itself in such a bad place?

Tim Kaine’s Debate Performance: What it looks like when a beta fails to be alpha

I can’t blame any of you if you decided to skip out on the VP debate. It wasn’t really on my list of things to do either, in fact I skipped it at first to take care of some coursework. I would have been fine just skipping it entirely, after all this election is more ‘the Trump show’ than anything else, but the words being tossed around afterwards encouraged me to take a look. I was happy to find out People weren’t exaggerating; Kaine truly was a mess in this debate. Many people were even comparing him to similar horrific debaters in the past. I’d be lying if I said I knew enough to make such a comparison myself, but if you’d like to see his and Pence’s performances yourself, you can check that out here.

My main takeaway from the whole thing was that Kaine, backed by the moderator (as you’d expect from the ‘unbiased media’) was trying very hard to be on the offensive the whole time, literally as if he was trying to copy what he would think was a more dominant style of debate. It wasn’t. Pence, on the other hand, remained generally collected, calm, and came out looking like the good guy whenever Kaine burst in with an interruption and one of his tirades. I have to give Pence some serious credit, it must be hard to keep your cool when you have the equivalent of a small attack dog nipping at your heels for 90 minutes. Kaine also came off overall rather nervous and unprepared to deal with the spotlight, with some saying he seemed almost robotic and that his performance was overplanned, which doesn’t surprise me seeing how robotic Clinton’s campaign has been in general.

The interesting thing about this debate, however, was the way the polls and opinion pieces shaped out afterward. For perhaps the first time in this election the MSM wasn’t entirely hard left. Sure you have your extremely partisan sources who will side with their candidate through thick and thin, but other typically left leaning outlets such as The Washington Post actually sided with Pence in the debate, and even reader polls on typically left leaning sources were coming up Pence. In Pence’s credit his calm collected demeanor showed he certainly had experience in the arena and went along nicely with Trump’s more dominant attitude. But that alone isn’t enough to sway a hardline left media to Pence’s side: You’d expect them to praise Kaine for putting Pence on the ‘defensive’ so often. But their dislike of Kaine here stems from one simple fact:

No one, from any slice of life or side of the political spectrum, respects a beta. Doubly so if that beta tries and fails to act like an alpha.

You might wonder, then, if betas get so much hate for trying to act like an alpha, what hope there is for them? Becoming alpha and trying to act alpha are 2 different things. There are a lot of things you can’t fake that easily, and from Kaine’s twitching, avoidance of the camera, and jittery demeanor an air of fear was projected. So when Kaine lashed out (which was extremely often) it didn’t ever seem out of dominance or alphatude, but out of fear and panic. This is something you might see in some of your not-so-alpha friends. Earlier I even talked some about that beta friend everyone has who just can’t seem to get it, but when he actually tries to man up and be an alpha and defend himself you get someone who starts acting just like Kaine did.

That’s not something I’m pulling out of thin air, either. Just a few months ago I had an old friend who goes by Jared. There were a lot of reasons he was starting to get on my bad side: He was more emotional than even most girls I knew, unwilling to take steps to improve himself, and blamed me for all his problems even though I was an entire city over. Typical beta behavior, right? It doesn’t stop there. Jared has what I’d call a ‘kettle complex‘. It’s something you probably notice in some of your friends: Maybe one day or week they seem patient, but once a threshold gets hit they lash out against anyone and everyone they can see. That was Jared to a T. We’d all have some stabs at him here and there, usually just playing with him, and he’d go along with it, not laughing because he never took it as the joke it was supposed to be despite how obvious it was that it was meant in jest, but sucking it up and turning the other cheek. If he were an alpha you’d expect him to simply ignore it or laugh a little and throw a fun (and sharper) shiv back at the people poking and, crucially, not getting mad. At most if an alpha took it seriously he’d stand up and tell them to knock it off. Instead every time he’d simply turn the other cheek… for a while. Once he hit his boiling point he’d blow his top and start yelling at everyone around, especially his ‘friends’. It’s what most people would call having an ‘episode’.

Do you think this show of supposed dominance made him come off as a cool asshole or a dominant man? No way; everyone looked down on him when he was taking their shit, and everyone looked down on him even more when he had an outburst. They didn’t see it as him standing up for himself, and if he were honest with himself he’d agree. It makes him look like a scared animal, backed into a corner. A doe when hunted will do its best to put up a fight when put into a corner. Instead of standing up for himself when it mattered, or throwing back jokes in good fun, he always seemed like he was retreating and then lashing out.

That’s exactly what Kaine came off looking like. A man who’s crowning achievement in his political life is getting chosen to run with one of the worst people in American politics. The second to an old crusty cunt with no other real claim to fame, and a man, nay a boy, who blew his top when the first bit of pressure came on. Even the left won’t respect a boy like that, and it’s no surprise he got the backlash he did.

When a beta goes on the offensive, no one sees it as a man evolving into alphatude, but as a dying animal trying desperately to grasp back any prominence it had.

 

Tim Kaine’s Debate Performance: What it looks like when a beta fails to be alpha

Is Day Game becoming Over-saturated?

I was browsing around Roosh’s forums the other day, and happened upon a thread in regards to day game. Day game, as most of you are probably aware, is a type of game that emphasizes approaching women during the day. The skillset you need to be successful at daygame is somewhat different than that of night game, and it’s become more and more popular over the last few years because of traditional failings related to night game.

However, this topic wasn’t exactly roses. The OP complained that over the past few years he noticed several people getting into daygame, eventually leading to what is essentially a flood of people putting out very poor day game. He’s concerned that this sort of thing is conditioning women to day game, making it much harder to pull girls you’d normally have no trouble pulling. Some men jumped to agree with him, having seen similar things in other areas, while others were less in agreement.

So is Oversaturation in Day game a problem, or could it become a problem?

Yes, in some areas day game will or is becoming oversaturated and overall less effective.

But how is this a problem, and what exactly is causing it? Is it just betas trying to break out of their betaness that’s causing day game to start to lose some of its edge in some areas, or are other things contributing?

Well first, let’s get this out of the way: This isn’t unprecedented at all in the history of game. In fact, just a few years back when day game was starting to get a lot more popular these very same complaints were being made about night game. People were constantly complaining that at a lot of clubs you’d easily have several dozen guys for every girl, and each and every one of them would be spitting the same (usually lackluster) game at the few girls around. Of course this just ran girls off over time, making the problem even worse. So Daygame was thought to be a savior, a sort of way out of that for guys with those problems.

Now that a few years have passed, every guy has gotten the clue that night game just isn’t what it used to be in a lot of places, and that a healthy injection of daygame is needed to spruce up their notch count. As a result the same sorts of things are starting to hit day game that hit night game.

To understand how much of a problem this is, you need a decent understanding of why day game can be really effective. The initial idea behind it when comparing it to night game is how much a man sticks out when he’s the only one to approach a girl during the day. 98% of guys are scared to death of approaching a girl out of the blue when the sun’s out, so when a guy walks up to and talks to a chick on the street corner or in the coffee shop, it would likely be the only real approach that had been made towards her during the day in a long, long time. That immediately scores a lot of points in the guy’s favor, and through a good opener he’d be well on his way to making a good impression and eventually scoring a lay.

Now take that same situation and throw 30 guys who are super direct daygamers onto the same street as you. Now do you see the problem? In areas with a heavy population of (bad) day gamers, you’ll easily be guy number 6 or 7 that day rather than guy number 1 that week. Not to mention the bad lines being thrown at her are liable to put her in a bad mood by the time you get to her, especially if she was just approached. A girl who wouldn’t ordinarily blow you off even on a bad day would happily do it then. You could be the most confident guy on the corner and still be at a massive disadvantage simply because they’re in a bad mood.

But that’s not the only thing that could be ruining your chances. Over the past few years we’ve seen the rise in a new way of ‘approaching’ girls. The rise of dating apps like Tinder where the game is extremely weighted in the girl’s favor signaled a big change in the dating market as we knew it, and not in a good way. Tinder suffers the same problem that Facebook and basically every other social media platform has: beta males flock to decent looking girls and flood them with attention, boosting the fuck out of their egos and making them insufferable and anti social on a good day. But Tinder takes it one step further. On facebook you had thousands of guys ready to give you attention. It was pretty obvious what they wanted, but becvause it was Facebook most of them would be very passive and not try and score a date or notch with the girl. It just wasn’t considered the right place to do it. Tinder on the other hand has 1000s of guys ready to take a girl out on a date and fuck her at a moment’s notice. This immediately boosted flake rates exponentially, and is starting to affect women in day to day conversation. They’re a lot less open to subtle or not so subtle flirting after their Tinder fix, even though 99 times out of 100 you’re an easy step up gamewise from guy number 2000 on tinder. Sure, he’s not going to get any himself, but when the girl has been flirted with 6 times in an hour on Tinder she won’t be as open to flirting outside of it. Over time it may completely close her off to interaction with unknown men in real life at all. It has less of an effect in the short term than 6 day game approaches in an hour, and you’ll have a much greater chance than any of those tinder guys ever will, but nothing is more annoying than being ignored while a girl flips through Tinder or blown off on a Friday night because she has a million ”’options”’.

So with all that being said, is day game really dying? It’s not really as bad as I’ve made it out to be. A big part of dealing with this is location. there are plenty of areas without shitty day gamers roaming the streets, and plenty of avenues left untested for game. In a lot of areas and small or medium universities you just won’t have to concern yourself with it at all. And Tinder and others like it are also an avenue themselves, though I’d refrain from using them exclusively. they’re good supplements to be tacked on after a few daylight approaches. Just expect a fair share of annoying and egotistical cunts in your inbox.

Where will game go after this? Will a new big avenue open up for men to exploit? Will day game settle down within the next few years? It will be really interesting to see how the game transforms over time. If you can be a pioneer in that transformation you’ll find yourself with notch numbers you’d only dreamed of.

Is Day Game becoming Over-saturated?

It’s Time for Trump to Strike, Hard

It’s no secret that Trump’s campaign has been a bit of an anomaly from the start. He’s known, for better or worse, as a brash talker and a man who says what’s on his mind. While this has appealed to quite a lot of people who feel the need for someone with a strong, right wing stance to take the fore, it has caused the media and public attention to be centered upon him for most of the election. While in many ways this was what ultimately let him pull ahead in the primaries and nab the nomination, It’s no secret that his lack of favorability has negatively affected his campaign in some ways. The most damaging is that it has caused him to scale himself back a bit in the past few months which, though that has created many benefits, has threatened to somewhat alienate him from his core. It also hasn’t done as much as it could to court new voters (though he’s done a lot more than most republican candidates could ever dream to), mainly because of the MSM’s penchant for spinning everything he does badly, some even going so far as to condemn him for stopping in Louisiana to help out during the flood, while seemingly giving Obama and Hillary a pass for mostly ignoring it. trump’s never been truly put on the defense, his power in controlling the frame has protected him from even the mightiest of attacks, but it’s been close for a while now, and the media persona of him is getting it9o people’s heads.

However, this media blockade on Trump has recently seen a bit of a breach. People aren’t talking about Trump as much this weekend. Why? Hillary Clinton’s health problems have been confirmed. Her collapse on the side of the road after leaving a 9/11 memorial has brought her declining health the attention it truly deserves (after, of course, weeks of the media telling us we were all crazy conspirators for believing she did have health problems). It’s not so much the actual fact that Hillary is sick as is the fact that people are actually talking about it. Where her emails and other scandals had failed to make enough of a blow into her credibility, it seems her health problems will. Rumors are flying around that Hillary is dying, and that the Democrats will replace Hillary soon, among many others.

So what does this mean? It means it’s time for Trump and Republican outlets to strike back. Hard.

We have the attention of the fence sitters and even much of the left wing now. They’re concerned about their party and about what their side has been telling them. They’ll be more open to seeing our side now that we’ve been proven right in such a major area. They’re already filled to the brim with doubt, and it’s up to us to confirm these doubts and fill their heads with the truth. Sure, many of them will stay true to their side to the very end, that’s just the nature of politics, but we’d be fools to not take advantage of such a major opening. Even those who cannot be converted to our side may be persuaded against voting or turn to a 3rd party as holes start and continue to open up in the democrat’s defense. Maybe Hillary really is dying, or maybe it is a temporary spat with a disease, but one thing is for sure: After this breach of trust and explosion of rumors, if Hillary isn’t the next to keel over, her campaign will be.

It’s Time for Trump to Strike, Hard

All Girls Are the Same

It always seems like no matter what friend group I jump into there’s always at least one guy who just doesn’t seem to ‘get it’ when it comes to game. It doesn’t matter if they’re tall, handsome, loaded, ripped, or anything else; they just can’t seem to get anyone in bed with them. Whether it be for lack of trying or just an absolute obtuseness to anything even semi-related to flirting, these poor guys are always the ones throwing out excuse after excuse every time rejection comes their way. The ones who won’t even approach are the worst about this, because they build themselves up inside a bubble that makes them think girls are into them and-because they won’t even approach-they never technically have any proof to the contrary.

These poor betas always have excuses to throw up the moment you try and point out ways they can improve. They either immediately start to attack you, or throw out lie after lie and phrase after phrase to try to convince themselves that what they’re doing (or not doing) is totally fine. No matter what approach I take to try and help them out, there’s one common phrase most of them love to fall back on: “All girls are the same”. To his mind this is a phrase that satisfies his need to convince himself not to go after girls: if they’re all the same then why bother pursuing them? It also satisfies the other caveat: a good reason for his constant rejection. “If all girls are the same then it makes sense I can’t get a single one because they’re all disposed to hate me and go after Chad Thundercock instead, right?”

The funny thing about this phrase is that, he’s not wrong… to a point.

People who have been in the game for a while have recognized that there are many common themes to the actions you have to take to turn girls on. While the shy girl over in the corner may not be the exact same as the girl sitting in the middle of the room with her tits out, picking up both of them will require common elements like confidence. Both of them will probably throw some shit tests your way and require a similar grand strategy to get into bed. But the approaches you’d want to make to each of these girls would likely be markedly different. For example, You could have a pretty heavyhanded go at the slut in the center, but if you wanted to go after the shy girl instead, you’d need to lighten your touch if you don’t want to scare her off.

But let’s take the statement a bit further. What if every single girl was attracted by the same thing as every other girl? Imagine if the same act was enough to get every girl into bed, whether she was the sluttiest girl in a hundred mile radius or the most prudish church girl you’ve ever met. Surely the beta’s claim would have weight then, right?

Well no, in fact it’d make him look even worse. If every girl was seduced by the exact same things, and turned off by the exact same things, then everyone who figured out how the game worked would have a 100% success rate. Then he’d have no excuse at all. If it was predetermined what would work on every girl and what wouldn’t his failures would be even more laughable.

This excuse and most others really show a lack of effort on the betas part: if he can’t even approach enough girls to dispel the very basic lies and half truths he throws out, then there’s really nothing you can do for him. Men grow through adversity, and if he’s not willing to seek out adversity and rejection to get stronger then he’ll be left in the dust. Don’t waste time with men like these, there’s nothing you can do to change them.

 

All Girls Are the Same